<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GOP&#8217;s Latest Defense of Palin: There is No Bush Doctrine!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://roadkillrefugee.wordpress.com/2008/09/13/gops-latest-defense-of-palin-there-is-no-bush-doctrine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://roadkillrefugee.wordpress.com/2008/09/13/gops-latest-defense-of-palin-there-is-no-bush-doctrine/</link>
	<description>Snarky Political News, Analysis and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 01:24:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Re</title>
		<link>http://roadkillrefugee.wordpress.com/2008/09/13/gops-latest-defense-of-palin-there-is-no-bush-doctrine/#comment-1834</link>
		<dc:creator>Re</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 03:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roadkillrefugee.wordpress.com/?p=4360#comment-1834</guid>
		<description>On ABC This Weak, George Will joins the legion of Republican clueless about the Bush Doctrine. 

http://www.newshoggers.com/blog/2008/09/george-wills-fu.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On ABC This Weak, George Will joins the legion of Republican clueless about the Bush Doctrine. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.newshoggers.com/blog/2008/09/george-wills-fu.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.newshoggers.com/blog/2008/09/george-wills-fu.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Missives From Suburbia</title>
		<link>http://roadkillrefugee.wordpress.com/2008/09/13/gops-latest-defense-of-palin-there-is-no-bush-doctrine/#comment-1792</link>
		<dc:creator>Missives From Suburbia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 03:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roadkillrefugee.wordpress.com/?p=4360#comment-1792</guid>
		<description>I think Anita may be onto something here.  It took me less than five minutes to track down the White House&#039;s National Security Strategy on their web site.  In Chapter V, section A, the first two paragraphs state... well, you can read it for yourself, Rog Pits:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss/2006/sectionV.html

In fact, in the past, Bush&#039;s own staffers have expounded upon his administration&#039;s doctrine publicly (calling it &quot;The Bush Doctrine), and the only debate they seem to have is whether there are six or seven parts to it.

The term &quot;Doctrine&quot; is standard nomenclature used during any presidency to define foreign policy strategies.  There is a Bush Doctrine, just as there is a Clinton Doctrine and a Truman Doctrine (etc.)  

See, that&#039;s the funny part about this whole topic:  EVERY president has a foreign policy doctrine, either explicit or implicit, based on the statements they make during their presidencies.  Given the text on the White House web site, I&#039;d argue that Bush&#039;s is fairly explicit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Anita may be onto something here.  It took me less than five minutes to track down the White House&#8217;s National Security Strategy on their web site.  In Chapter V, section A, the first two paragraphs state&#8230; well, you can read it for yourself, Rog Pits:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss/2006/sectionV.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss/2006/sectionV.html</a></p>
<p>In fact, in the past, Bush&#8217;s own staffers have expounded upon his administration&#8217;s doctrine publicly (calling it &#8220;The Bush Doctrine), and the only debate they seem to have is whether there are six or seven parts to it.</p>
<p>The term &#8220;Doctrine&#8221; is standard nomenclature used during any presidency to define foreign policy strategies.  There is a Bush Doctrine, just as there is a Clinton Doctrine and a Truman Doctrine (etc.)  </p>
<p>See, that&#8217;s the funny part about this whole topic:  EVERY president has a foreign policy doctrine, either explicit or implicit, based on the statements they make during their presidencies.  Given the text on the White House web site, I&#8217;d argue that Bush&#8217;s is fairly explicit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anita Marie</title>
		<link>http://roadkillrefugee.wordpress.com/2008/09/13/gops-latest-defense-of-palin-there-is-no-bush-doctrine/#comment-1787</link>
		<dc:creator>Anita Marie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 00:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roadkillrefugee.wordpress.com/?p=4360#comment-1787</guid>
		<description>GOOGLE...it....

Are all McSamers Internet Challanged?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GOOGLE&#8230;it&#8230;.</p>
<p>Are all McSamers Internet Challanged?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rog Pits</title>
		<link>http://roadkillrefugee.wordpress.com/2008/09/13/gops-latest-defense-of-palin-there-is-no-bush-doctrine/#comment-1784</link>
		<dc:creator>Rog Pits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 23:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roadkillrefugee.wordpress.com/?p=4360#comment-1784</guid>
		<description>So would you mind linking to where we can find the official White House policy page titled &quot;The Bush Doctrine&quot;? Oh that&#039;s right, you can&#039;t, it doesn&#039;t exist.
-------------------
&lt;em&gt;I assume you saw the video in this post where McCain defines the Bush Doctrine.  Are you calling McCain a liar?  A man who spent 5 1/2 years in POW camp?  How dare you!

-RK Ref&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So would you mind linking to where we can find the official White House policy page titled &#8220;The Bush Doctrine&#8221;? Oh that&#8217;s right, you can&#8217;t, it doesn&#8217;t exist.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
<em>I assume you saw the video in this post where McCain defines the Bush Doctrine.  Are you calling McCain a liar?  A man who spent 5 1/2 years in POW camp?  How dare you!</p>
<p>-RK Ref</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
